Thursday, January 28, 2010

Doctors, Faith & Medicine



What the Bible says about Doctors & Medicine?
by Dale Brown

It is the conviction of many religious people that to use medicine or to rely on medical science one is failing in their faith toward God. As a result some endure much undue suffering, and at times die from ailments that might otherwise be cured through the most basic of treatments.
The awesome nature of the living being has been observed and studied since the beginning of creation. The psalmist wrote, "I will give thanks to Thee, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; wonderful are Thy works and my soul knows it very well" (Psm. 139:14). Physicians will acknowledge that regardless of their treatments the human body is quite resilient and will heal itself of most ailments whether treated or not. But when one experiences trauma do to a severe accident or when the immune system is compromised in some way a patient will more than likely die without medical or divine intervention. A broken limb might very well heal on it’s own but a little help from the X-ray machine will help the doctor to set the bone in the proper position.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses often carry a "no blood" card, a legal document declaring refusal to accept a blood transfusion. Christian Scientists often avoid medical treatment because of their belief in "mind over matter". Similar ideas are endorsed by well meaning but naive Christians who in effort to please God refrain from pain medication, vaccinations, and often even vitamins. Children are often the innocent victims of their parents convictions.

The chemistry of the human body is one which is in a constant and delicate balance. If the essential minerals and vitamins necessary for life are not received through normal food intake the body begins to break down. On the other hand, if there is an overload or unbalanced intake of these items the body’s internal organs go to work in effort to balance out the chemistry.
The social habits of both the religious and non-religious often set into motion events that sooner or later will manifest in some form of ailment. Long term smoking is understood by most to cause respiratory problems and those who rally around the social drink or the cookie-jar are likely to end up with diabetes. God causes the sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. It is the simple law of reaping and sowing at work. Our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, and if we don’t take care of it we can only blame ourselves.


EVERY HERB OF THE FIELD IS FOR MAN
When God created man He blessed him and told him to rule and subdue every living thing on the earth (Gen. 1:26-28). In the very first chapter of Genesis God tells us that He created every herb of the field for man (Gen. 1:29&30). Some of these plants contain medicinal qualities. From the opium poppy comes a number of pain-killers including codeine and morphine. The prophet Ezekiel wrote of trees whose leaves are for healing, or medicine in the KJV (Eze. 47:12). From the bark of the willow tree came aspirin, an analgesic. From the plant foxglove came the heart drug digitalis. From the poisonous plant nightshade (belladonna) came atropine. Though not an herb, ordinary bread mold contains the antibiotic formula, penicillin, which helps the body to fight infection. Even wine has been observed to have some degree of medicinal qualities if not abused. Paul wrote to Timothy to "use a little wine for the stomach and your frequent ailments"(1 Tim. 5:23). Proverbs 31:6 says to give strong drink to him who is perishing, which seems to suggest a rather crude yet effective means of taking ones mind off the inevitable.
 
SO WHERE IS FAITH?

And in the thirty-ninth year of his reign Asa became diseased in his feet. His disease was severe, yet even in his disease he did not seek the Lord, but the physicians (2 Chr. 16:12). This passage is often cited as an indictment against physicians, but it is actually an indictment against Asa for not seeking God. He went to seek foreign gods (2 Kgs. 1:2&16) but never turned to the God of Israel.

Luke, the author of the Book of Acts and one gospel, was a physician and companion of Paul. When all is said and done, whether God uses a physician or not, ultimately it is He who should get the glory. If God does not give the ability to the doctor to diagnose the problem there is nothing he can do anyway. We should be prayerful about which doctor we go to because we might need a specialist. The story of a woman healed by Jesus who had spent all her money on doctor bills yet was not healed of a blood hemorrhage which plagued her for twelve years illustrates the point (Mk. 5:25).

"It is good for me that I was afflicted, That I may learn Thy statutes" Psm. 119:71
Affliction can have a positive result in that when we are weak we are more apt to do a bit of soul searching.

The scripture is clear that we should first of all examine ourselves (1 Cor. 11:28-32) and in an act of submission to each other confess our sins to one another and pray for one another that we would be healed (James 5:14-16). James even suggests anointing with oil as did the disciples in Mark 6:13. The oil in this case is not meant to be a medicinal application but rather a symbol of the Holy Spirit whom we are placing our faith in for the healing.

When King Hezekiah became ill, Isaiah the prophet instructed him to place a cake of figs on the boil and he would recover (2 Kgs. 20:7). Surely God could have healed him without the figs.
Faith healing is not positive thinking, though a good attitude is a healthy thing. As the psalmist wrote, a joyful heart is good medicine. God however, is able to heal us whether we think right or not. Healing resulting from a "mind over matter" technique is "us" doing the healing and not God. Doctors often get the same results with a sugar pill or placebo.

"And this is the confidence which we have before Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us"(1 Jn. 5:14). It is God’s will that we often miss.

Sometime after Christ left this earthly plain Peter healed a lame man whom Jesus must have walked by a number of times, for the man had been left at the temple gate by his parents everyday to beg for alms (Acts 3:2-8). Why did Jesus not heal him? God’s will? The timing was not right. In this case God chose to glorify Himself through the church, thus validating the message being preached by Peter and John.

Should one end up going to the doctor he should not feel condemned, for the Bible tells us, "There is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." (Rom. 8:1)
"Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Just as it is written, ‘For Thy sake we are being put to death all day long; we were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.’ But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord."(Rom. 8:35-39)

There is one disease that no man can cure; that is our last one. But on the other hand, going to be with Christ might be considered to be the ultimate healing. Paul wrote, "To live is Christ, and to die is gain". (Phil. 1:21)

Wednesday, January 27, 2010


If one checks out all the references in the Bible concerning pastors, there are some very serious considerations to contemplate.
One of the things I've noticed in our New Testament teachings concerning the gifts of the Spirit and the order Jesus established in the Body of Christ relating to authority in the church settings, is that the pastor had an important responsibility as overseer of the flock of the LORD. Not one that rules the flock with a rod of iron. Also, I can't find a reference in the Word that the pastor was also supposed to be the main teacher or preacher in the assembly, ie; the boss. "First Apostles, prophets, teachers, and the responsiblity of the pastor was lower on the list than the others".
In doing a word study on "pastors" on Bible Gateway, this is what I found. As you can see, the LORD gives pastors a stern warning. This is not something to take lightly as we can see.

Jeremiah 23
1Woe be unto the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD.

2Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD.

3And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase.

4And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them: and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall they be lacking, saith the LORD.

5Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth.

6In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.

7Therefore, behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that they shall no more say, The LORD liveth, which brought up the children of Israel out of the land of Egypt;

8But, The LORD liveth, which brought up and which led the seed of the house of Israel out of the north country, and from all countries whither I had driven them; and they shall dwell in their own land.

9Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness.

10For the land is full of adulterers; for because of swearing the land mourneth; the pleasant places of the wilderness are dried up, and their course is evil, and their force is not right.

11For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, saith the LORD.

12Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, saith the LORD.

13And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria; they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel to err.

14I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness; they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah.

15Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts concerning the prophets; Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink the water of gall: for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land.

16Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD.

17They say still unto them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you.

18For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it?

19Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked.

20The anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have executed, and till he have performed the thoughts of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly.

21I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied.

22But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings.

23Am I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off?

24Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD.

25I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed.

26How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart;

27Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal.

28The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD.

29Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?

30Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour.

31Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith.

32Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD.

33And when this people, or the prophet, or a priest, shall ask thee, saying, What is the burden of the LORD? thou shalt then say unto them, What burden? I will even forsake you, saith the LORD.

34And as for the prophet, and the priest, and the people, that shall say, The burden of the LORD, I will even punish that man and his house.

35Thus shall ye say every one to his neighbour, and every one to his brother, What hath the LORD answered? and, What hath the LORD spoken?

36And the burden of the LORD shall ye mention no more: for every man's word shall be his burden; for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God.

37Thus shalt thou say to the prophet, What hath the LORD answered thee? and, What hath the LORD spoken?

38But since ye say, The burden of the LORD; therefore thus saith the LORD; Because ye say this word, The burden of the LORD, and I have sent unto you, saying, Ye shall not say, The burden of the LORD;

39Therefore, behold, I, even I, will utterly forget you, and I will forsake you, and the city that I gave you and your fathers, and cast you out of my presence:

40And I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you, and a perpetual shame, which shall not be forgotten. Jeremiah 23

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

What About Testimonies of People in Cults? CARM


We cannot deny that people in different and contradictory religious systems have equally strong testimonies of the truth of their beliefs. Mormons, for example, frequently appeal to a "burning in the bosom" as a way of knowing that Mormonism is true. Likewise, Jehovah's Witnesses "know" that their religion is correct. Christian Scientists, Christadelphians, and others each have countless members who sincerely believe in the validity of their religions and will testify to their truth. These groups emphasize "inner testimonies" to different degrees. But the fact remains: contradictory belief systems have members who testify to the truth of contradictory religious systems.

Christians likewise bear their testimonies concerning the truth of Christianity. We testify to the validity of monotheism (in opposition to Mormonism's polytheism),1 of salvation by grace alone (in opposition to Jehovah's Witnesses' teaching that obedience to Law requirements are necessary).2 2), of the reality of sin (in opposition to Christian Science's non-existence of actual sin)3 3), and, of course, that Jesus has saved us from our sins. Obviously, not all contradictory belief systems can be true. So, what can we conclude about these testimonies that affirm the validity of different and contradictory religious systems? We can conclude three things.

First, testimonies are subjective. They are not absolute. They are conveyed to us by people who have feelings about a religious experience or belief. In essence, it is an experience and experiences are, by nature, subjective. And feelings are often just that -- feelings, and not reality.

Second, the fact that people bear witness to contradictory belief systems means that testimonies are not proofs of the validity of any religion -- no matter how strong they might be. Someone who appeals to his testimony as proof of his religion can easily be countered by someone else stating he has an equally strong testimony of something to the contrary. Yet, both parties will still assert they are right.

And third, if we assume that at least one person (or group) is correct, then that would mean that all the other people who have a testimony of the truth are, in actuality, being deceived in some way. From this we can affirm that many people are being deceived who "know for a fact" that their religion is correct.

How would you know if you are deceived?
If it is true that people who sincerely believe in something can be deceived, how would they discover whether or not they are, in fact, being deceived? Simple. Turn to God's word.

I believe that in order to escape deception, a person would need an authoritative and reliable source of information outside his "testimony" by which he can judge spiritual truths and compare his experience. He must be willing to subject his "testimony" to something other than the grilling of his own subjective experience which he claims to be from God. Why? Because if the person used his own testimony to validate his experience then he could not determine whether or not he is deceived since that is appealing to that which is part of the deception to discover truth. It won't work.

Therefore, in order to discover if you are being deceived, you must appeal to God's word and compare your "testimony" to it. If what your testimony points to is in contradiction to God's word, then your testimony is not true.

Testing the Testimony
If someone had a testimony that a religious system was true and that system said it was okay to lie, we could easily conclude that his testimony was incorrect since it supports something that goes against God's revealed word. The person would be deceived. This is simple. However, applying this principle to people isn't easy because since they believe they are not deceived, they will find a way to adopt an interpretation consistent with their belief systems.

Some people will believe their testimonies (feelings) even if the Bible says something to the contrary. Why? Because they will subject God's word to their own testimony. This is commonly done by Mormons. For example, the Bible states that God does not even know of any other Gods (Isaiah 44:8). Yet, in Mormonism God has a goddess wife.4 So, Mormons reinterpret the verse to agree with their testimony. They will state that God knows of no other gods "of this world." They, in effect, add words to the text. We then can become locked in the horns of an interpretive dilemma which is sometimes difficult to overcome.

Nevertheless, among biblically based cult groups, it is almost unanimously agreed that a testimony comes from the Holy Spirit who, according to Scripture (1 John 2:27), resides within the true believer and bears witness of the truth (John 16:13). This testimony comes from the Holy Spirit who is supposed to testify of Jesus (John 15:26).5 This is what all cults claim in one form or another. Yet, there is one factor I've encountered that is an important part of the witness of the Spirit in a true believer.

Assurance of forgiveness of sins
"These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God," (1 John 5:13).
Because the cults serve false gods, they also have false gospels (Gal. 1:8-9). All these "other" gospels are works-oriented. That is, because the members of cults must cooperate with God in some form (obeying commandments, being baptized, etc.) in order to get or maintain the forgiveness of sins, they cannot have assurance of salvation. Yet, the Bible tells us that we can know we have eternal life.

I know that I have eternal life. I know that all my sins are forgiven right now. I know and testify that I am saved by the true and living God and that Jesus is my only Savior. My sins are forgiven and I know I have eternal life.

Of all the cult members I've spoken to, none have told me that they have assurance of eternal life. I can only conclude that they do not have the testimony that is from God. Therefore, they are wrong. They are deceived.

It becomes necessary for all of us to examine our beliefs in the light of God's word and to change our beliefs accordingly. Ultimately, we should come to that place where we have assurance of eternal life -- in agreement with God's word. Do you have this assurance?



This article is also available in: Español

1. McConkie, Bruce, Mormon Doctrine, p. 163 and James Talmage, Articles of Faith, p. 443.
2. In the Watchtower magazine of Feb. 15, 1983, p. 12, four requirements for salvation are listed. The second one states, "Many have found the second requirement more difficult. It is to obey Gods laws, yes, to conform ones life to the moral requirements set out in the Bible. This includes refraining from a debauched, immoral way of life. 1 Corinthians 6:9, 10; 1 Peter 4:3, 4." Hence, JW theology denies salvation by grace through faith alone.
3. Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, 447:24.
4. Talmage, James, Articles of Faith, p. 443.
5. I recommend going to the Christian Doctrine section of CARM and reading about who Jesus really is. In cults, the definitions of who Jesus is are also contradictory.
Home
Jesus Saves
Videos
Radio
Forums
Schools
Store
About
Donate
A - B
Christianity
Answers for Seekers
Baptism
Bible
Bible Maps
Bible Online
Bible Studies
Christian Doctrine
Christian Issues
Creeds and Confessions
Devotions
Evangelism
Miscellaneous Topics
Parables
Prayer Ministry
Sermons
Testimonies
To the Christian Church
Apologetics
Apologetics
Apologetics Dialogues
CARM Radio
CARM Videos
Cut and Paste Information
Discussion Boards
Email and Responses
Evidence and Answers
Heresies
Lost Books
Objections and Answers
Online Schools
Research Links
Responding to Critics
Verses Examined
Women in Ministry
Women's Issues
Bible Difficulties
Genesis - Deuteronomy
Joshua - Esther
Job - Song of Solomon
Isaiah - Malachi
Matthew - Mark
Luke, John, and Acts
Romans - Philemon
Hebrews - Revelation
Dictionary of Theology
A - B
C - D
E - F
G - H
I - J
K - L
M - N
O - P
Q - R
S - T
U - Z
Religious Movements
About Cults
Christadelphianism
Christian Science
Emerging Church
How to Have Perfect Faith
International Church of Christ
Islam
Jehovah's Witnesses
Kabbalah
Mormonism
New Age Movement
Oneness Pentecostal
Open Theism
Religions List
Roman Catholicism
Seventh Day Adventism
Shepherd's Chapel
Universalism
Wicca
Secular Movements
Abortion
Atheism
Creation Evolution Debate
Evolution
Raelians, The
Relativism
Questions
About Baptism
About the Bible
About Bible Verses
About the Church
About Demons
About Doctrine
About Evangelism
About God
About The Holy Spirit
About Jesus
About Marriage
About Morality
About Pastors
About People
About Philosophy
About Religions
About Salvation
About Sanctification
About Sexuality
Other Questions
Skeptics Ask
Submit a Question
More Stuff
About CARM
Book and Movie Reviews
Book Recommendations
CARM Needs Your Help
Even More Stuff
Features
Food Recipes
Newsletters
Tracts
Languages
Chinese
Dutch
French
German
Indonesian
Japanese
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Spanish
Part of a series on
About Cults
Cults! An outline analysis
What makes a church or group non-Christian?
Cult Comparison Chart
Justification and Sanctification: What is the difference?
Do we have the right to make these judgments?
What is the truth?
A Test: Do you have the True Jesus?
edit portal Advertisement
25% off Logos Bible Software through CARM. This is what CARM uses for serious Bible study and research. It is well worth the investment.
Home | Contact | Donate | Copying and Linking | Report an error | Statement of Faith
Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry © Matthew J. Slick, 1995 - 2010

Monday, January 25, 2010

Paul's "Thorn in the Flesh? Sickness, or a Messenger of Satan?



It's of vital importance that Christians aren't blown about by every wind of doctrine. Some doctrines have become part and parcel of man's traditions in the church because they "sound" reasonable to the natural mind. But on closer examination of scripture we may find they are in error, and have been passed down by tradition so often, they become taken for granted, and merely assumed they are correct.

Take "Paul's thorn in the flesh" for example:

When taken into context, and examining the meaning of the words in these verses by Apostle Paul, it is apparent they have nothing to do with healing.

For example, the word "buffet" means to to strike, a blow, to box, slap, hit, etc;
(in those connotations).

To further explain, Paul said this "thorn in the flesh" was a messenger of Satan sent to "buffet" him, ie; to battle, contend with, box around, etc.

In other words to interfere with Paul's ministry, making it difficult for him.

A messenger of Satan is a spirit, not a sickness or disease.

Also, there is no place in scripture where a "thorn in the flesh" has to do with sickness. It is a fairly common expression used today, even by unbelievers to mean something that is irritating in some fashion.

In Paul's case, when told by the LORD His grace would be sufficient, it simply meant that Jesus would give him the power to endure, and overcome the attempts by this messenger of Satan to hinder his ministry and life.

I've heard many Christians refer to Paul's "thorn in the flesh" as some sort of sickness or infirmity, but again, there is nothing in these verses to indicate that whatsoever.

All Christians have "thorns in the flesh" sent as the trials of life intended to test us. However, again, to use these verses in conjunction with healing only, is not accurate.

When we are sick, the LORD'S grace is there to help strengthen us. In the flesh, we are all weak. Therefore, God's grace is made perfect in weakness, but these verses were never intended to mean that God's grace, in our weakness meant that we were supposed to suffer the pains of sickness and death without any sort of medical care and relief. That's where some folks have added onto, and twisted these verses to try and make them into something entirely different than what they actually mean, and then into a "tradition".
~~~~~~~~~
Paul gave the reason why the LORD allowed Satan's messenger to buffet him, to keep him from pride in his spiritual achievements.

"And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure. For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, that it might depart from me. And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness." (2 Corinthians 12:7-9)
~~~~~~~~
Buffet:

–noun 1. a blow, as with the hand or fist.
2. a violent shock or concussion.

–verb (used with object) 3. to strike, as with the hand or fist.
4. to strike against or push repeatedly: The wind buffeted the house.
5. to contend against; battle.

–verb (used without object) 6. to struggle with blows of hand or fist.
7. to force one's way by a fight, struggle, etc.
~~~~~~~
Origin:
1175–1225; ME < OF buffe a blow +-et -et

Related forms:

buf⋅fet⋅er , noun

Synonyms:
3. slap, cuff, box, hit, sock, wallop.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Cults: Do We Have the Right to Make these Judgments?


"To pronounce another religious group to be false can seem a pompous undertaking, especially in a culture that preaches tolerance for everything from homosexuality to a mother's "right" to kill her unborn child. Tolerance is the banner that unites much of our culture and anyone who points a judging finger at someone or something is often ridiculed.

But Christians are told in the Bible to separate themselves from the sinful practices of man and to expose error. "Examine all things and to hold fast to that which is true" says God's word (1 Thess. 5:21). So we do.

What does it mean to examine if we do not judge what is right and wrong? Jesus judged the Pharisees as hypocrites. Peter judged Ananias and Saphira as liars (Acts 5:3-4). Paul judged the Galatians as fools (Gal. 3:1).

The reason something can be said to be right or wrong is because the Bible has laid out before us a moral and doctrinal standard that is clear. It is wrong to lie. So, we are able to say to someone who lies, "What you are doing is wrong." That is making a judgment.

Likewise, with the cults, as Christians we are commanded to be able to give answers to everyone (1 Pet. 3:15) and to contend for the faith that was delivered by the apostles (Jude 4). If we do not fight for the faith, the faith will be lost. If we do not expose the errors of the cults then the cults will move unchecked in the world and lead even more into eternal destruction.

To make a judgment means that we must recognize that there are absolutes. In a world that worships relativism, absolutes are not welcome and the cults that espouse their demonic doctrines beg tolerance.

CARM stands for the truth of God's word, not a compromising collection of beliefs that changes as people's whims change. The cults are cults because they deny the true God, add works to salvation, and corrupt a multitude of biblical truths. Their end and the end of all who follow them is damnation. To do anything other than warn people about them would be unloving."



This article is also available in: Español
Home
Jesus Saves
Videos
Radio
Forums
Schools
Store
About
Donate
A - B
Christianity
Answers for Seekers
Baptism
Bible
Bible Maps
Bible Online
Bible Studies
Christian Doctrine
Christian Issues
Creeds and Confessions
Devotions
Evangelism
Miscellaneous Topics
Parables
Prayer Ministry
Sermons
Testimonies
To the Christian Church
Apologetics
Apologetics
Apologetics Dialogues
CARM Radio
CARM Videos
Cut and Paste Information
Discussion Boards
Email and Responses
Evidence and Answers
Heresies
Lost Books
Objections and Answers
Online Schools
Research Links
Responding to Critics
Verses Examined
Women in Ministry
Women's Issues
Bible Difficulties
Genesis - Deuteronomy
Joshua - Esther
Job - Song of Solomon
Isaiah - Malachi
Matthew - Mark
Luke, John, and Acts
Romans - Philemon
Hebrews - Revelation
Dictionary of Theology
A - B
C - D
E - F
G - H
I - J
K - L
M - N
O - P
Q - R
S - T
U - Z
Religious Movements
About Cults
Christadelphianism
Christian Science
Emerging Church
How to Have Perfect Faith
International Church of Christ
Islam
Jehovah's Witnesses
Kabbalah
Mormonism
New Age Movement
Oneness Pentecostal
Open Theism
Religions List
Roman Catholicism
Seventh Day Adventism
Shepherd's Chapel
Universalism
Wicca
Secular Movements
Abortion
Atheism
Creation Evolution Debate
Evolution
Raelians, The
Relativism
Questions
About Baptism
About the Bible
About Bible Verses
About the Church
About Demons
About Doctrine
About Evangelism
About God
About The Holy Spirit
About Jesus
About Marriage
About Morality
About Pastors
About People
About Philosophy
About Religions
About Salvation
About Sanctification
About Sexuality
Other Questions
Skeptics Ask
Submit a Question
More Stuff
About CARM
Book and Movie Reviews
Book Recommendations
CARM Needs Your Help
Even More Stuff
Features
Food Recipes
Newsletters
Tracts
Languages
Chinese
Dutch
French
German
Indonesian
Japanese
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Spanish
Part of a series on
About Cults
Cults! An outline analysis
What makes a church or group non-Christian?
Cult Comparison Chart
Justification and Sanctification: What is the difference?
Do we have the right to make these judgments?
What is the truth?
A Test: Do you have the True Jesus?
edit portal Advertisement
Please consider supporting CARM with $5 a month. Help us reach over 8 million visitors a year, provide solid biblical answers, and equip Christians. All you have to do is click here. Thanks.
Home | Contact | Donate | Copying and Linking | Report an error | Statement of Faith
Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry © Matthew J. Slick, 1995 - 2010

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Cults! An Outline Analysis of them


This is from the CARM-Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry
It's a broad outline concerning the general characteristics of a cult. There may be some things listed here that are not true of one cult, but may be operational in another. Cults are not all the same. Most in fact have diversities in doctrine and beliefs. However, there will usually be more than just a few that fits into the general definition of being a cult
.

~~~~~~~~~

"Cults are everywhere. Some are mainstream and widely accepted. Others are isolationist and hide from examination at great expense. They are growing and flourishing. Some cause great suffering while others appear very helpful and beneficial. Which ever group it is, the ultimate end is their destruction when the Lord returns to claim His own.

What is a cult?
Generally, it is a group that is unorthodox, esoteric, and has a devotion to a person, object, or a set of new ideas.
New Teaching - has a new theology and doctrine.
Only True Teaching - often considers traditional religious systems to be apostate and it alone possesses the complete truth.
Strong Leadership - often an individual or small but powerful leadership group holds control of the group’s teachings and practices.
Asset Acquirement - often requires tithing and/or property transfer to the religious system.
Isolationist - to facilitate control over the members physically, intellectually, financially, and emotionally.
Controlling - exercises control over the members. Sometimes this is through fear, threatening loss of salvation if you leave the group. Sometimes through indoctrination.
Indoctrination - possesses methods to reinforce the cult’s beliefs and standards where opposing views are ridiculed and often misrepresented.
Apocalyptic - to give the members a future focus and philosophical purpose in avoiding the apocalypse or being delivered through it.
Experience - various practices including meditation, repetition of words and/or phrases, and ‘spiritual’ enlightenment with God are used as confirmation of their truth.
Depravation - sleep and food deprivation which weakens the will of the subject.
This is uncommon, though practiced by more severe cults.
Persecution - predictions of being persecuted, often combined with claiming any opposing views demonstrated against them as a form of persecution.
Many have non-verifiable belief systems;
For example, they would teach something that cannot be verified.
A space ship behind Hale-Bop comet
Or, that God, an alien, or angel appeared to the leader and gave him a revelation.
The members are seeded angels from another world, etc.
Often, the philosophy makes sense only if you adopt the full set of values and definitions that it teaches.
With this kind of belief, truth becomes unverifiable, internalized, and easily manipulated through the philosophical systems of its inventor.
The Leader of a Cult
Often charismatic and is considered very special for varying reasons:
The leader has received special revelation from God.
The leader claims to be the incarnation of a deity, angel, or special messenger.
The leader claims to be appointed by God for a mission.
The leader claims to have special abilities.
The leader is often above reproach and is not to be denied or contradicted.
Cult ethos
Usually seeks to do good works, otherwise no one would join them.
They are usually moral and possess a good standard of ethical teaching.
Many times the Bible is used or additional "scriptures" are penned.
The Bible, when used, is always distorted with private interpretations.
Many Cults recruit Jesus as one of their own and redefine him accordingly.
Cult groups vary greatly.
From the ascetic to the promiscuous.
From esoteric knowledge to very simple teachings.
From the rich and powerful to the poor and weak.
Who is vulnerable to joining a cult?
Everyone is vulnerable.
Rich, poor, educated, non-educated, old, young, previously religious, atheistic, etc.
General Profile of cult member (some or all of the following):
Disenchanted with conventional religious establishments.
Intellectually confused over religious and/or philosophical issues.
Sometimes disenchanted with society as a whole.
Has a need for encouragement and support.
Emotionally needful.
Needs a sense of purpose.
Financially needy.
Recruitment techniques
They find a need and fill it. One of the ways they do this is called...

"Love Bombing" - Constant positive affection in word and deed.
Sometimes there is a lot of physical contact like hugging, pats on the back, and touching.
Cult group members will lend emotional support to someone in need.
Help them in various ways...whatever is needed.
The person then becomes indebted to the cult.
Compliment them, reassure them, and make them the center of attention.
Many Cults use the influence of the Bible and/or mention Jesus as being one of their own; thereby adding validity to their system.
Scripture twisting
Those that use the Bible take verses out of context.
Then mix their misinterpreted verses with their aberrant philosophy.
Gradualism
Slow altering of thinking processes and belief system through repeated teaching.
People usually accept cult doctrines one point at a time.
New beliefs are reinforced by other cult members.
Why would someone join?
The cult satisfies various needs:
Psychological - Someone could have a weak personality, easily lead.
Emotional - Someone could have recently suffered an emotional trauma.
Intellectual - Someone has questions that this group answers.
The cult gives them approval, acceptance, purpose, and a sense of belonging.
The cult is appealing for some reason. It could be . . .
Moral rigidity and purity.
Financial security.
Promises of exaltation, redemption, higher consciousness, or a host of other rewards.
How are they kept in the cult?
Dependence
People often want to stay because the cult meets their psychological, intellectual, and spiritual needs.
Isolation
Outside contacts are reduced and more and more of the life of the member is built around the cult.
It then becomes very easy to control and shape the member.
Cognitive Reconstruction (Brainwashing):
Once the person is indoctrinated, their thinking processes are reconstructed to be consistent with the cult and to be submissive to its leaders.
This facilitates control by the cult leader(s).
Substitution
The Cult and cult leaders often take the place of mother, father, priest, teacher, and healer.
Often the member takes on the characteristics of a dependent child seeking to win the approval of the leader and or group.
Indebtedness
The member becomes indebted to the group emotionally, financially, etc.
Guilt
The person is told that to leave is to betray the leader, God, the group, etc.
The person is told that to leave would mean to reject the love and help the group has given.
Threat
Threat of destruction by God for turning from the truth.
Sometimes physical threat is used, though not often.
Threat of missing the apocalypse, or being judged on judgment day, etc.
How do you get them out?
The best thing is to try not to let them get trapped in the first place.
If you are a Christian, then pray.
But, to get a person out of a cult takes:
Time, energy, and support.
Teach them the truth.
Give them a true replacement for their aberrant belief system.
Show the cult group's philosophic inconsistencies.
Study the group and learn its history seeking clues and information.
Try and get them physically away from the cult group.
Give them the support they need emotionally.
Alleviate the threat that if they leave the group they are doomed or in danger.
Generally, don't attack the leader of the group...that comes later.
Converts often feel a loyalty and respect for the founder of the group.
Confront them when needed.
Hopefully, this basic outline will give you information to see how Cults work and how to avoid them. If you have someone who is lost in a cult, you need to pray and ask the Lord to remove them and give you the insight and tools needed. It can be a long and arduous task and very often ends in failure. This is not an easy ministry."

Friday, January 22, 2010

A Reasonable Parent Would Have Sought Medical Care for Neil Begley, doctor says


By Nicole Dungca, The Oregonian
January 22, 2010, 11:14AMView full sizeRANDY RASMUSSEN/THE OREGONIANWayne Mackeson, Jeffrey Beagley's defense attorney, addresses the jury during the trial of Beagley and his wife, Marci.


The Beagley trial
Benjamin Brink /The OregonianMarci and Jeff Beagley


ARCHIVE: Previous stories about faith healing in Oregon.Jeffrey and Marci Beagley, members of the Followers of Christ church, are charged with criminally negligent homicide for allegedly failing to provide adequate medical care for their 16-year-old son, Neil, who died in June 2008 of complications from a urinary tract blockage. The trial began on Tuesday.

The main characters in the courtroom today, including the Beagleys, are:
» Judge Steven Maurer
» Prosecutor Greg Horner
» Prosecutor Steven Mygrant
» Defense attorney Wayne Mackeson represents Jeff Beagley
» Defense attorney Steve Lindsey represents Marci Beagley
» Doctor Edward Guillery, a pediatric nephrologist


11:11 a.m. Both defense lawyers had no questions for Guillery and the state had no further witnesses.

Because defense was not expecting to start calling witnesses until Monday morning, the court will adjourn for the day.

11:09 a.m. Would Neil have survived if they had sought treatment the week before he died?

“Yes,” Guillery said. Even if they had sought treatment the day before he died, that would be the case, he continued.

Horner took up that In that day before his death, with an effort to seek medical care, would he be alive?

“Absolutely,” Guillery said. Though his condition would have been worse, medical personnel in the city have been trained to deal with that situation.

“Could Neil have survived even the day of his death had he received medical care?”

“Yes,” Guillery said.


11:04 a.m. Horner asked more about what long-term care Neil would have gotten. Guillery said he would likely be stabilized in the intensive care unit before staying in the hospital for several days. They would likely seek the treatment of dialysis, and eventually a kidney transplant.

He explained dialysis, particularly peritoneal dialysis, which is often used by pediatricians, and also said a kidney transplant “would be the best thing for (Neil).”



11:01 a.m. Horner asked more about what kind of treatment Neil would have likely gotten if he had gotten medical treatment in the week before his death.

Guillery said he would get an exam, and after several steps, he would likely be referred to a local nephrologist like himself, he said. He would have also be referred to an intensive care unit.

They would have administered dialysis immediately, Guillery said. This referral to a type of dialysis matches the opinion of yesterday’s medical expert, a local pediatric urologist.


10:48 a.m. Horner asked if a reasonable parent would have sought medical care for Neil in those last two weeks.

“Certainly” in those two weeks, and the days before his death, Guillery said.

The longevity of the symptoms and his decline were factors for that opinion, he said.

The testimony followed a lengthy back and forth between Maurer and Mackeson over the defense’s objection about Guillery’s use of statements from family members taken from the police. The jury had been ordered out of the room for the discussion.

10:31 a.m. Guillery also relied on statements from family members concerning Neil’s conditions in the last few months, and days, of his death. They showed a child with a “pattern of inexorable decline” in the last week of his death, Guillery said.

Were the symptoms presented in a way that would have raised concerns about the possibility of death?

“Yes, I think a parent would have that concern,” Guillery said. “If they had been recording the diet this way and seeing these symptoms, a reasonable parent would have that concern.”

10:24 a.m. Jurors were brought back in, and Horner came back to the food journal.

"What was in that journal that caught your attention that you think is important?"

"The fact that there was one is what really caught my attention. Parents bring in food journals .. for much younger children, and they usually reflect a significant concern that something is wrong," Guillery said.

The journal suggests that "something has been going on for a while," he said.

The contents were also striking to Guillery.

"He was getting a peculiar diet that suggests to me that there was really a problem," Guillery said. Sixteen-year-olds should be eating entire bags of groceries, he said.

The vomiting without fever or diarrhea or other flu-like symptoms was quite unusual, he said.

10:15 a.m. Maurer ultimately ruled that Guillery’s opinion on what a reasonable parent would do will be allowed in questioning.

Maurer had responded to Mackeson by saying Guillery’s opinion on that issue would help show a “community standard” that is integral to the judgment of the case.

Mackeson continued to argue that the question would not be helpful, since the jury is the one who must decide what is or is not reasonable on standards that stem from a community, not necessarily an expert looking at the facts of the case who presents a “professional standard” for the parents.

Maurer and Mackeson went back and forth with several arguments, comparing the Beagley case to medical malpractice trials and a trial involving an automobile accident.

10:02 a.m. Mackeson objected to a question from Horner that concerned the actions of a reasonable parent in the Beagleys' position. The jury was led out of the courtroom because of the objection.

The question is a doctor’s comment on the state of mind of the defendant, Mackeson said. Mackeson called it a “legal question” and unhelpful for the jury.

Horner argued that the trial is about a “reasonable person’s” judgment. What Guillery would ultimately comment on, Horner said, is whether they were doing something appropriate or reasonable. Guillery, as a medical expert who deals with many parents, would be a good source for what a “reasonable parent” would do, Horner said.

9:59 a.m. Guillery referenced the food journal again, agreeing with a question from Horner that asked if the Beagleys’ attempt to feed Neil glucerna, a formula for adults who have diabetes, was “inappropriate.”

9:58 a.m. Guillery was “disturbed” by the food intake journal that recorded how much Neil ate: “Most striking to me is the diary of the food intake, which as a doctor who is also in general pediatrics, is a disturbing thing to see,” he said.

He was also struck by the reports showing comments from family members prior to the death, as well as the printouts detectives found in the room where Neil died. They concerned internet searches about peptic ulcer disease and treating heartburn.

They were a sign of an awareness of a “significant medical problem,” Guillery said.

9:51 a.m. “Are you aware of any children dying from this condition?” prosecutor Greg Horner said.

“No, I’m not,” Guillery responded, before further explaining: “I’ve never encountered a child who has died from this beyond that early newborn period.”

“Have you ever heard of any situation that you’re aware of, of any child dying from this condition that was completely untreated?” Horner asked.

Guillery said he had never seen that situation, or heard a report of that.

Horner zeroed in on Neil’s case: why did Neil die, as opposed to these other children with this condition?

“Because he received no medical care during his life,” Guillery said.


9:44 a.m. Guillery testified that he has seen many children with Neil’s condition of posterior urethral valves. He is one of four pediatric nephrologists in Oregon, he said.

“We know that when boys have this condition, it very commonly leads to an inexorable decline of their kidney function,” Guillery said.

A minority of those children are identified after birth, and he sees those children for an extended period of time, he said.

The children who have this condition diagnosed later in life have often been brought to a pediatrician because of problems with bed-wetting or urinary accidents during the day, he said.

9:42 a.m. Guillery agreed with the medical examiner’s cause of death, which was involved complications with urinary tract outlet obstruction.

“It’s entirely obvious,” Guillery said. “There can be no doubt, based on my impressions.”

9:30 a.m. Doctor Edward Guillery, a pediatric nephrologist, was the first witness to be called to the stand today. He follows yesterday’s testimony from a pediatric urologist and the medical examiner who conducted Neil Beagley’s autopsy. Both medical experts said Neil Beagley’s condition had been beyond anything they had seen before.

Guillery's specialty, nephrology, is the field of medicine that studies kidney disease."

Indiana Couple Sentenced in Baby's Death


Associated Press in NY Times/August 13, 2005

Franklin, Ind. -- An Indiana couple who chose to pray over their dying newborn daughter rather than seek medical care for her were sentenced Friday to six years in prison for reckless homicide.

But a judge suspended most of those prison terms for Dewayne and Maleta Schmidt, instead ordering the couple to serve about a year each at a work-release center.

Their daughter, Rhianna Rose Schmidt, died in August 2003, less than two days after she was born at the couple's home, from an infection typically treated with antibiotics.

The Schmidts' church, the General Assembly and Church of the Firstborn, advocates prayer and faith healing over medical intervention but does not require members to shun medical care.

''Rhianna would be alive today if not for the actions and inactions of her parents,'' Johnson County Superior Judge Cynthia Emkes said.

The Schmidts' probation includes a directive to seek medical help for their two other children should they suffer life-threatening health problems.

Rhianna was the third child of parents attending the Schmidts' church to die since 1998 after family members refused medical treatment, according to published reports. The church is in Morgantown, about 30 miles south of Indianapolis.

Children born to members of the church in Colorado and Oregon also have died after their parents refused medical treatment.

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Jury Indicts Midwife in June Death of Newborn-Nov 16/05


Judges are beginning to look more closely at prayer-healing deaths in the Church of the First Born. In reality there is no godly, moral or legal excuse for helpless babies and children dying painful, agonizing deaths who could easily have been saved by timely medical expertise. If true to form, the COFB birth mother had received no prenatal care which may have contributed to what appeared to be a premature birth.

Jury indicts midwife in June death of newborn
Associated Press/November 16, 2005

Martinsville – A grand jury has indicted a Morgantown woman on a charge of practicing midwifery without a license in connection with a newborn's death in June.

Doris White, 72, pleaded not guilty to the charge Monday and was released without bond from the Morgan County Jail after her initial hearing.

Prosecutor Steve Sonnega said White has agreed not to assist with the births of any infants while the criminal case against her is pending.

White's indictment arose from the death of Sarah Leeman, who was delivered about two months premature by White at the newborn's parent's Martinsville mobile home.

White and the child's parents are members of the General Assembly and Church of the Firstborn, where many members turn to prayer rather than medical care.

Investigators said the infant, born May 28, weighed less than 3 pounds, and received no medical care. An autopsy showed the baby died of bacterial meningitis.

Prosecutors impaneled a grand jury to look into the infant's death.

Sonnega said the grand jury interviewed more than 25 people before indicting White. Jurors also looked at the role of the parents, Louis and Patricia Leeman, but declined to charge them.

During Monday's hearing, White said she understood the charge, but did not understand why she was charged because she had "done this for 30 years and never been questioned before."

A message was left Tuesday seeking comment from White's attorney, Bill Van Der Pol.

In May, a Johnson County jury found another couple belonging to the same church guilty of reckless homicide for refusing to seek medical treatment to help their newborn daughter in 2003.

A judge sentenced both Dewayne and Maleta Schmidt to spend one year at a work release facility.

http://www.rickross.com/reference/firstborn/f...

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Midwife Ordered to Stop Delivering Babies


Indianapolis Star/August 19, 2006
By Tim Evans
A 73-year-old Morgan County woman who served as midwife at the birth of an infant who died has been ordered by a judge to stop delivering babies.

But Doris White -- who has delivered about 100 babies, many for people affiliated with a church whose members turn to prayer rather than doctors -- told the court she couldn't promise to abide by the order.

Morgan Superior Court Judge G. Thomas Gray issued the permanent injunction Thursday prohibiting the Morgantown woman from practicing midwifery.

Gray's ruling likely ends a legal case that began after a grand jury indicted White in November 2005 on a felony charge of practicing midwifery without a license. The indictment followed an investigation into the death of Sarah Leeman.

The baby died June 4, 2005, six days after her premature birth at the Martinsville home of her parents, Louis and Patricia Leeman, who are associated with the General Assembly and Church of the Firstborn in Morgantown.

Medical experts testified there was a 98 percent chance the baby, who died from complications of an infection, would have survived if she had been seen by medical professionals and treated with an antibiotic, said Morgan County Prosecutor Steve Sonnega.

Neither White nor her attorney could be reached Friday.

Sonnega said the injunction is a fair end to the case, but added White could face contempt and possibly other charges if she violates the judge's order.

"This was a way of getting Doris' attention," he said. "We have put her and others on notice that there are laws that regulate midwifery."

While the criminal case focused on White's violation of Indiana law regulating midwives, it was framed by the larger issue of the sometimes-blurry line between the law and religious freedom. That is obvious, Sonnega said, in the stance of church members who say they respect the state's laws but answer only to God's law.

The prosecutor said he had hoped the indictment would be enough to provide the leverage to get White to stop delivering babies. But, after meeting with her and other church officials, he realized that was not the case.

"In a way, it is refreshing to have people whose faith is so pure and strong," he said. "But on the other hand, they are out of step with the laws of Indiana."

Monday, January 18, 2010

Family Says Church Allowed Woman to Die Following Childbirth


This tragedy happened in Cushing, Oklahoma. Kathy's family still grieves over her untimely, unnecessary death. They have never been able to find out exactly what happened that day in the room where Kathy died, because they weren't allowed entrance by COFB members, to be with Kathy during her birthing process.
Kathy left 5 children without a mother. However, her husband married three months after her death.

KTUL News Channel 8, Oklahoma/November 1, 2005
By Teri Bowers
Cushing -- There is a delicate balance between religion and the law. NewsChannel 8's Teri Bowers has the story of Kathy Capdeville, a life lost in that balance. She was only 26 years old when she died giving birth. Her family believes her life could have been saved. But, they claim Kathy's church let her die in the name of faith.

Kathy Capdeville's family describes her as a devoted daughter, sister and mother to her four children. She was due to have her fifth baby this past August.

"I told her, promise to call me as soon as you go into labor because I'm three hours away," says Kathy's sister Jeanne Shadaram. "And, she promised she would. And that's the last time I talked to her."

Kathy's family was nervous because she planned to have the baby at home, attended to only by church midwives. Kathy had followed her husband into the Church of the Firstborn in Cushing. They shun doctors and rely on prayer for healing.

"We worried about this ever since she married into the faith," said Kathy's father, David Griffin. "And, it happened."

Kathy's family says it was by chance they learned she'd gone into labor. They called and were told Kathy was resting after delivering a healthy baby girl. But, within hours, the news turned tragic.

"From what we've been told, at about 5:20 she had Kathryn, the baby," Shadaram says. "And she never passed the placenta. She never passed the afterbirth. And, she bled for six hours, she lay in bed bleeding before she passed away."

"There's no reason for my daughter to have died like that," adds Griffin.

Kathy's family says she had sought medical care before and had promised she would get help if anything went wrong. But, church members told them Kathy's faith was strong.

"What they say just doesn't make sense to us, that she would willingly lay down and die knowing she had five children," Shadaram says.

And they don't believe religion should protect the midwives and other members of the church who were in the house during Kathy's final hours.

"Somebody in that house should have stepped up and did the right thing, regardless of religion," says Shadaram. "If they'd called 911, an ambulance could have come, if she was alert and awake like they say she was, Kathy could have signed a refusal to go to the hospital and it would have been done."

It is not done. Cushing police investigated Kathy's death. It is now up to the Payne County District Attorney to decide if charges are warranted against anyone who was in the home.

"It's extremely difficult," says Cushing Deputy Chief Terry Brannon. "I think any time you begin to intertwine religion in terms of potential criminal negligence, you get into an area that is awfully difficult."

The law is more clear when a child's life is at stake. The Oklahoma Legislature removed religious belief as a defense in the death of a child in 1983. Kathy's family wants lawmakers to act again to more strongly regulate midwives. They they may never get answers to the questions that haunt them about her death -- was she in pain? Did she ask for help? Or did she lose consciousness and peacefully drift away?

"I have to hope she was okay and that she went easy," Shadaram says. "And, God help them if she was in pain and they witnessed that. Then they'll have that nightmare just like I do."

Now, Kathy's family believes the only way they'll find any peace is to make others aware.

"I just miss her so much," says Shadaram. "But I know I have to tell people. This is my outlet, this is how I deal with what's happened, I do research and try to change what's going on."

Kathy's family hopes they can bring change to spare others their grief and their loss.

We tried to contact members of the church, including Kathy's husband, both in person and by phone. They declined to comment. Kathy Capdeville did not have a living will or anything similar in writing clearly expressing her religious wishes. So, her family says it comes down to their word against the church members whether she would have wanted medical attention.

There is no word yet on when the Payne County district attorney will decide for or against charges. There was another death from the very same church in 1987, when a three-month-old girl died of pneumonia. Her parents served a two-year sentence for failing to seek medical help."

Saturday, January 16, 2010

The Battle Over Faith Healing


In the Lord's hands

"Just before Christmas 1996, 1-year-old Patrick Foster caught a bad cold. As the sniffling persisted week after week, Daniel and Anne Marie Foster did what they had always done when one of their three children got sick, they prayed the devil would be driven away.

But Patrick was not healed. As winter turned to spring, he became more lethargic and gaunt. It was March when Daniel and Anne Marie noticed the growth bulging from their son's left side.

As the growth swelled, the Fosters increased their prayers. Four times each week they attended services at Faith Tabernacle Congregation Church in north Philadelphia, asking their pastor to pray aloud for Patrick.

Regardless of how sick Patrick got, there would be no visit to a doctor. And no medical treatment, not even an aspirin. Members of Faith Tabernacle, like thousands of faith-healing Christians across the United States, trust that God, inspired by the prayers of true believers, will heal sickness and disease. To seek a doctor's care would be to turn their backs not only on their faith, but on God himself. Patrick was in the Lord's hands, Anne Marie Foster would tell police.

But one day in early May, the Fosters' private religious beliefs came crashing through the doors of the Philadelphia prosecutor's office.

A neighbor had seen the listless boy sitting on his father's lap on the front steps. Patrick's body was so wracked by the growth that had ballooned from his kidney and attached itself to his liver and heart, that he needed his father's help just to lift his head.

The neighbor called the child abuse hot line.

Twenty-four hours from death

Social worker Michael Bonetti first looked in on Patrick only hours after the neighbor's phone call. The Fosters reluctantly let Bonetti inside their well-kept two-story brownstone.

Daniel Foster carried Patrick downstairs and laid him face down on the sofa. The boy winced, then groaned.

The growth, which at 6 pounds was now almost a third of Patrick's weight, was hidden by the rust-colored blanket pulled up over his shoulders. A pinkish rash covered the boy's cheeks and hands. His left eye was swollen shut; his lips were cracked and white from dehydration.

Bonetti urged the Fosters to rush Patrick to a hospital. They refused. The following afternoon Bonetti returned with the police and a court order demanding that the Fosters release Patrick to a doctor's care.

At St. Christopher's Hospital, doctors said Patrick likely would have died in another 24 hours. The large mass growing from his abdomen was a Wilm's tumor, a common form of childhood cancer that 90 percent of patients survive if they receive prompt treatment.

Doctors removed the tumor but doubted Patrick would live. He spent six months in the hospital, his parents and extended family always at his side. The prayers were never-ending.

But the battle over what was best for Patrick Foster was just beginning."

Prayer Doesn't Take the Place of Medical Care


"Kara Neumann, 11, died March 23, 2008, of diabetes. I know what you're thinking right now: "Seriously? Diabetes? Isn't that treatable?" Yes, it is. It is a manageable condition provided one has the proper medication and monitors his or her diet closely. So now you're probably thinking, "Is this some story about a girl in some third world country who couldn't see a doctor and how much people like this need our help?" Nope. Kara was from Weston, Wis., and, as Time Magazine reported, she died because her parents chose to pray for her health instead of seeking medical attention. For this reckless endangerment, her parents will stand trial in the Marathon County Circuit Court next month.

While I fully believe in the power of prayer, I also believe God gave people brains so they could use them. If someone is smart enough to become a doctor, I believe his or her expertise can be helpful when someone I know is sick. That does not mean I will give up praying for them, or that I will give up hope if doctors say there's no chance. Miracles happen every day, and I think God can heal people even when the circumstances look bleak or impossible.

However, God provided us with resources at our disposal so that we could use them to our advantage. People don't reject school or avoid reading books because they believe God will infuse them with all the knowledge they need. People don't refuse to eat because they trust God will nourish their bodies. That's simply not the way the system works. People use what they're given every day, so why not use medicine or doctors?

There are many religions and branches of Christianity that refuse medical assistance of any kind, saying all they need is God. I don't want to call anyone stupid because of personal religious beliefs, but I fail to see any intelligence in rules like these. Other parents have let their children die, like Kara, from easily curable or preventable diseases. That seems awfully unfair to the children who can't make the decision themselves. It's also devastating to the family who loses their child. Why bring that kind of pain on yourself? Seems a little masochistic, doesn't it? To choose to let something terrible and easily preventable happen?

A lot of religious people with similar beliefs to the Neumanns are quite worried about this trial. They are afraid they might lose their right to treat their children according to their religions. I say, "Good!"

If you want to harm yourself, then be my guest. I think it's stupid of you and a waste of life, but it's ultimately your decision. When someone endangers a child, someone they are supposed to protect, on the other hand, I get upset and angry. How dare a person risk someone else's life! Isn't one of the biggest and most important parts of parenting caring for a child? What good are parents who don't love their kids, teach them and care for them when they are sick?

It pains me to hear about cases like Kara's, ones that could have been prevented. I hope this upcoming trial will set a better standard of life for everyone involved and not just placate some crazy religious practice. Perhaps in the future, people will choose medicine alongside prayer instead of thinking it's an either/or situation."




Hannah Kaase is a sophomore majoring in animal and dairy science. She can be contacted at opinion@reflector.msstate.edu.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Sorcery in the Bible,Pharmakeia and Modern Medicine



ANY CONNECTION?

A QUESTION I WAS ASKED:

'I HAVE HEARD THAT THE “SORCERERS” DESCRIBED IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION ARE ACTUALLY MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS AND THAT WE ARE SINNING WHEN WE GO TO SEE OUR DOCTORS. ANY TRUTH IN THIS CLAIM?'

MY ANSWER:

There are three or four places in the New Testament describing 'sorcerers' and 'sorcery' (in the KJV that is, newer translations often don't use these words). Some (mainly in the cults, sects and extremist charismatic groups) have associated these references with modern pharmacists and the medical profession; but is there any validity in this approach? We need to look at these words very closely:

SORCERER (Acts 13:6,8 - KJV)

This is from the Greek 'magos', it means 'sorcerer', 'magician' or, 'wise man' (Word 3097 in Strongs). There is no association with pharmacy or medicine.

SORCERIES (Acts 8:11 - KJV)

This is from the Greek 'mageia' it refers to magic (Word 3095 in Strongs) – no connection with pharmacy.

SORCERIES (Revelation 9:21 and 18:23 - KJV)

This is from the Greek 'pharmakeia' (Word 5331 in Strongs). There is some connection here to the word 'pharmacy' which we must look at in a moment.

SORCERERS (Revelation 21:8 and 22:15 - KJV)

These uses of 'sorcerers' (KJV) use a different Greek word to the singular use of this word in Acts 13:6,8; so this is not just the plural of the same word. From the Greek 'pharmakeus' (Words 5332 and 5333 in Strongs). So there is a connection between all four uses of words 5331, 5332 and 5333 in Revelation. There is indeed a relationship here to the English word 'pharmacy' (which of course, is directly derived from these Greek words). Is this calling modern medical practitioners 'sorcerers'? Is this saying that you and I should never visit a doctor??

Okay. Now lets ensure that we correctly understand this:

The root meaning of this group of Greek words is 'druggist' 'poisoner' or, 'giver of potions'. These particular 'sorcerers' were persons able to prepare and dispense potions. But why did they dispense these potions? Was it in order to give relief from illness?

Absolutely not! It was in order to stimulate hallucinations or visions! We must understand that it was long part of pagan religious practice to administer potions, or drugs, which would encourage hallucinations! There is, of course, a direct parallel here to modern illicit drug taking. But these original 'pharmacists' were involved in the black arts and in demonology; the basic idea was that taking certain potions could bring one into contact with the spirit world, and that this was to be desired. But the fact that the modern English word 'pharmacy' happens to be derived from 'pharmakeia' frankly proves absolutely nothing! Do people visit doctors in order to be given drugs which will bring them into contact with the spirit world? Of course not!! People visit medical practitioners in order to to have an illness diagnosed, to be treated for sickness, or to gain relief from illness! Yet there are some extremist charismatic ministries around today which teach that we sin when we visit a doctor just because the word 'pharmacy' happens to be related to these Greek words!

We must understand that on several occasions the Bible backs up the principle that sick people should look around for remedies for their sickness. This is a very clear biblical principle! Lets look at some examples:

When Job was afflicted by boils he seemed to be aware of the principle that the draining sores needed to dry out so he sat in ashes (Job 2:7-8).

Jeremiah refers to the balm of Gilead which was evidently deemed to have medicinal qualities (Jeremiah 8:22; 46:11).

When Hezekiah was seriously ill, Isaiah told him to put some figs to boil, although we cannot be sure in what way this may have been medicinal (2 Kings 20:7).

The therapeutic affect of happiness of mind upon one's health comes out several times (Proverbs 17:22, for instance).

The medicinal use of wine is mentioned in Scripture several times (including 1 Timothy 5:23). Indeed, today pharmacologists recognise how good a small amount of wine is for the digestive system, backing up Paul's advice to Timothy!

The good Samaritan treated the wounds of the injured man with wine and oil (Luke 10:34). Wine is an antiseptic and will tend to coagulate blood, thereby assisting healing. Oil soothes and forms a coating.

The Church at Laodicea is admonished to use their locally-produced eye salve because of their lack of spiritual vision (Revelation 3:18).

Even way back in Genesis it is obvious that the Israelite midwives had developed obstetrical care to a high standard (Genesis 35:17). It has been said that the procedure of Genesis 38:27-30, for instance, would even be very challenging for modern obstetricians!

Mark 5:26 shows that physicians were certainly available within Israel and we also know that Luke was a physician. According to the Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, the rabbis ordained that every town should have at least one physician (Vol 3, page 1430, 1997 printing).

So we see it well established that those becoming sick or injured were expected to seek medical help! Indeed Jesus Himself shows acceptance of this principle when He said:

'.....They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.' (Luke 5:31)

What about very serious illnesses?

In the case of Christian believers who develop life-threatening injuries or illnesses, we see the principle established that they should make their illnesses known to fellow-believers and to request prayers (James 5:13-18). The prayers of faith are indeed efficaceous as many of us have found! But this does not mean they should not also seek medical help! All the sick of the Bible are prepared to seek whatever help is available. James 5:15 (KJV) says 'The prayers of faith shall save the sick', that is, those prayers will save those sick people whom God decides to heal – many of us have learned that this is not a blanket promise, and if such very sick righteous people die, they are instantly healed at the point of death in any case (when their souls depart to be with the Lord). Of course, we should pray for the gravely ill whether they are in the faith or not.

Likewise Psalm 103:3 states that the LORD,

'....Healeth all thy diseases.'

That is, it is God alone who heals! When we are healed, we are only ever healed through the grace of God. Doctors may do their bit but God alone grants healing. So Psalm 103:3 says that God heals all our diseases: that is, He heals all the diseases or illnesses or injuries which we attain healing from. But this is not a blanket promise of healing in this life as countless other Scriptures show and many of the righteous of the Bible were not healed in this life (though were certainly healed at the point of death).

But the Bible does suggest that those who are in a relationship with God do wrong when they place their full trust in physicians – God alone is our healer and deliverer!! Too many times I have heard sick people say things like,

'I am undergoing treatment but I have full faith in my doctors!'

Yes, seek medical help and assistance, but place your full trust and faith in God who alone is our healer – not in doctors!

Finally, what about different kinds of remedial treatment and assistance?

Some Christians seem to think that only herbal treatment is acceptable, but where is the justification for that view? This ignores the fact that medical practice is increasingly adopting herbal agents and practices where they are helpful, and also ignores the fact that some herbal treatments – when exhaustively tested – have been shown to be completely useless (although such treatments could have helped as placebos). Others think that any far eastern medicine must be useless at best or demonic at worst. Yet acupuncture, for instance, is apparently well established as a helpful treatment and I have never yet heard of anyone undergoing acupuncture treatment subsequently becoming possessed by demons!!

CONCLUSION

While the English word 'pharmacy' is indeed derived from a group of Greek words used to describe those pagans who used potions to encourage hallucinations in those who wanted to contact the spirit world, to suggest that modern medical pharmacists are in any way associated with the 'black arts' is as ludicrous as to suggest that when my friend took penicillin for a very serious infection, he was really more interested in contacting spirits!!! (By the way, my friend was healed and gave the full glory to God who alone is our healer). The modern medical profession is not by any means without its faults (there are certain things which I would certainly question) but it is ridiculous to blacken them (no pun intended!) because they borrowed a word which had sinister connotations in the original Greek!

Robin A. Brace, 2005.

Jury Selection Starts in Faith-Healing Trial Expected to Start Next Week


(Although General Assembly Church of the First Born is not directly affiliated with the Followers of Christ sect, the COFB, as it is generally referred to, has very similar views and doctrines regarding "faith-healing")



Jury selection starts in faith-healing trial
Trial expected to start next week
By Matthew Graham

The Clackamas Review, Jan 13, 2010

ADVERTISEMENTS

Jury selection in the faith-healing trial in the death of 16-year-old Neil Beagley took place this week, with the trial likely to begin on Tuesday, Jan. 19.

Neil's parents, Jeffrey and Marci Beagley of Oregon City, face criminally negligent homicide charges because of their son's death.

The Beagleys are members of the Followers of Christ Church, which rejects doctors and medical treatment in favor of faith healing.

In jury selection on Tuesday, defense attorney Wayne Mackeson questioned potential jurors on their values, views on parenting and views on lifestyles that differ from what some might consider the norm.

“This case really boils down to the duty of a parent,” he said to 14 potential jurors. Quoting a trinket of his mother’s, he said, “there’s no way to be a perfect parent; there are a million ways to be a good one,” before asking the jurors what qualities they think a parent should have.

Questions then drifted from that point – do a parent’s responsibilities change over time?

Neil was 16 when he died, and allegedly told family members he didn’t want traditional medical treatment. His competency and ability to make such a decision is likely to come up in the trial.

Mackeson also asked about potential jurors’ views on home schooling and how religion figured into their values and decision-making. Finally he asked about health care, whether potential jurors had regular doctors, whether they’d ever sought alternative treatment such as homeopathy or acupuncture and whether any of them had had flu-like symptoms and not immediately sought medical attention.

Questions from the defense attorney for just one pool of candidates took the entire morning, leading Judge Steven Maurer to speculate that jury selection would take the rest of this week. The trial itself then would start on Tuesday because courts are closed for the Monday holiday. Maurer said he expects the trial to take about two to two-and-a-half weeks.

Death by Faith


Here's a rhyme, how much wood could a wood chuck chop, if a wood chuck could chop wood?

Here's another. How much deception can be seen and heard, when there is no word, and nobody is really listening?

How long will we look the other way while people are ravaged by false teaching's promoted by men who spread their own miracle rumors?

It was E.W. Kenyon in his book the Hidden man on pg.99 wrote, “I know that I am healed because he said that I am healed and it makes no difference what the symptoms may be in my body.” An example would be if they are coughing and you say you have a cough they respond by “no I don’t, I haven’t had a cough in years.” That’s called denial of reality at best, and lying at worst.

This is what was adopted by Kenneth Hagin who writes in his book “In the name of Jesus” on the topic of divine healing and health. “I have so often said, I haven’t had a headache in so many years (45 to be exact) ... Just a few months ago, as I left the office building and started home, suddenly my head started hurting, someone might say, “well, you had a headache. No, I didn’t have one! I don’t have headaches. I haven’t had a headache since August 1934. 45 years have come and gone. And I haven’t had a headache…but if I had a headache, I wouldn’t tell anybody. And if somebody asked me how I was feeling, I would say, I’m fine, thank you.” (In the Name of Jesus, p.44) Notice he says he wouldn't tell you how he really feels because his words override the pain. Is this honest? Is it true? Is this the way someone is to represent the Lord. Did Jesus teach this nonsense? Of course not.

E.W. Kenyon studied at the Emerson College of Oratory in Boston which was a hotbed at the time for the emerging New Age thought. They imagined they have discovered laws of faith, promoting a Christianized version of occultism.

Kenyon had divorced his wife even when he taught that what one speaks they will possess. E.W Kenyon who is certainly the Father of the Word of Faith Movement taught divine healing and that it was always God's will to heal. But he died in a coma, brought on by a malignant tumor. He died from disease.

Kenneth Hagin states: It is not God's will for any to be sick (Healing the fathers Provision, p.9 ) I believe that it is the plan of our father that no believer should be sick that every believer should live his life to full time and actually wear out if Jesus tarries then fall asleep in Jesus. I state boldly that it is not the will of God my father that we should suffer with cancer and other dread disease and reap pain and anguish. No its God's will that we should be healed.”

While Hagin says he has had no headaches, he had 4 major cardiovascular failures. But this is one of those incidents he's not telling you (Christianity in Crises, pp.237-238; a Different Gospel by D.L McConnell) Hagin suffered 4 separate episodes of heart-crisis in 1939, 1942, 1949, and 1973.

Hagin claims he was healed of numerous sicknesses a “deformed heart,” “paralysis,” and “incurable blood disease.” He also declared his “healing from the top of my head to the soles of my feet” on August 7, 1934, so that “every symptom of distress, deficiency and physical wrongness was driven out of my body,” perpetually. “I'm still healed after 49 years,” Hagin said. (Kenneth E. Hagin, Exceedingly Growing Faith, 2d rev. ed. [Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1990, 48-49, 82-83.) His healing occurred on Tuesday of the “second week” of August 1934, or August 7, which was not the same date as the “second Tuesday” that month [August 14). Elsewhere Hagin gives various dates, such as “6 days before my 17th birthday [August 20, 1934,” which would be August 14, the “second Tuesday of August 1934”: (Kenneth E. Hagin, El Shaddai [Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 19801, 24-25.) But see Kenneth E. Hagin, How You Can Be Led by the Spirit of God (Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1978), 87 (healing on a “Thursday” in August 1934). In still another place Hagin claims his healing was on “August 8, 1934,” which was a Wednesday (Kenneth E. Hagin, Zoe: The God-Kind of Life [Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1981], 13.) Maybe Hagin needs his memory healed as well. (adopted from Christianity in Crises)

Kenneth Hagin died Sept. 23.2003 After eating breakfast his head fell to his chest. Charisma News Service reported that “An exact cause of death was not immediately known” Hagin had been hospitalized in a cardiac intensive care unit since Sept. 14, when he collapsed at home. (Charisma News Service September 23, 2003 edition People & Lifestyle) We later find out that was transported by an ambulance admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit and remained in the hospital until he died. This become an interesting point of contention because Hagin claimed he was healed of his heart problem supernaturally years before. He also held to the belief that one should actually wear out, not die this way.

E.W. Kenyon wrote mockingly, “We have sung `Nearer the cross' and we have prayed that we might be `Nearer the cross' but the cross has no salvation in it. It is a place of failure and defeat.” (Advanced Bible Course, p.279) Does this sound familiar? It should. Kenneth Hagin copies him, (as he did most of his theology) saying, “Do you think that the punishment for our sin was to die on a cross? If that were the case, the two thieves could have paid your price. No the punishment was to go into hell itself and to serve time in hell separated from God ... Satan and all the demons of hell thought that they had him bound, and they threw a net over Jesus and they dragged Him down to the very pit of hell itself to serve our sentence.”

If Jesus was not victorious on the cross, he was not victorious at all! Yet these same men will teach by his stripes we are healed. Which is it? Are we healed for our sicknesses at the cross and not for our sins?

It is reported that the “father” of the modern Word of Faith Movement Kenneth Hagin had his wife go to the hospital for an operation. Yet Hagin claims that Jesus “appeared” to Hagin and gave him a special anointing to heal the sick. (in I Believe In Visions). Is Hagin an anointed healer?

Kenneth Hagin had his sister die of cancer. Hagin’s great faith and words of confession did not keep her from death. I don't say this to belittle the pain or loss, but to point to the facts. It doesn't work like they say, otherwise this would not be happening to them. There would be a substantial difference between the faith teachers and those who do not practice this word faith confession. But the facts show otherwise.

'“Hagin's son mentioned that his own young son (senior Hagin's grandson) was “diagnosed as having a brain tumor that required immediate surgery,” but there is no mention of any faith healing whatsoever.''' (Kenneth E. Hagin, Jr., The Answer for Oppression (Tulsa, OK: Kenneth Hagin Ministries, 1983], 14-16, 23). (Cited from Christianity in Crises, Hank Hannegraaf)

Hagin and his son wears glasses as their eyesight is growing dim just like anyone else who grows older. Many of these men who promise healings are getting older, they wear hair pieces, and these are simple things compared to organic disorders that they supposedly heal. So they cannot even cure the ABC's and yet they claim they are curing in others the xyz's. And worst of all they run to the doctor for surgery. So what do they really believe?

Kenneth E. Hagin's son-in-law Buddy Harrison, who is the Founder of Harrison House Books, and Head of the Faith Christian Fellowship (FCF) Word of Faith denomination, died Nov. 1998 of cancer. This is unfortunate that this should occur, however it is evidential that the son-in-law of Kenneth E. Hagin, submitted to cancer and died. He was in the “faith movement” before Copeland and many others so... what does this mean in light of what he promoted and has written? Did he practice what he preached? definitely. But what he taught was simply was not true.

Promises are a never ending stream for the gullible. Benny Hinn says unequivocally “There will be no sickness for the saint of God” (Rise and Be Healed! 1991, p.14). “If your body belongs to God, it does not and cannot belong to sickness” (ibid. p.62); “The day is coming, I tell you this, I know it like I know my name, the day is coming there will not be one sick saint in the body of Christ. Nobody will be, nobody's gonna be, no one will be raptured out of a hospital bed. You're all gonna be healed before the rapture.” (Benny Hinn, “Praise the Lord,” 7/8/96) Bible verse- NONE. As often the case it rests on the authority of man, not God.

John writes Diotrephes loved to have the preeminence in the Church. There are many today that threaten the welfare of the believers by their preeminence. So it is important for us to identify the people who say they represent God and can ruin peoples health and lives by there teachings. Some people take this all too lightly until they are visited with personal disaster from this theology.

Satan said to God about Job (2:4), “Skin for skin, yes, all that a man has will he give for his life.” The most heart-breaking stories involve people who have incurable organic sickness and are desperate for a last chance. They listen to anyone who can give them hope and they will do anything to preserve their life, sometimes even believing a lie for some hope!

There are those who preceded the modern day movement of healing that died. they too taught God will always heal by faith. A.A. Allen died from cirrhosis of the liver. Jack Coe died from polio. Dr. Hobart Freeman and over 100 of his followers died after refusing medical attention while believing for their healing (more of this at the end of the article).

Many others have died needlessly because they tried to confess healing and bind Satan ignoring medical treatment. According to their position, divine healing is in the atonement, and when Satan attacks, the authority of the believer uses the name of Jesus, and confesses their healing. Even if these teachers say it is an attack from Satan - how did Satan get in there? Since they were not confessing sickness or disease in the first place. Some like Copeland go even further and say it is divine health not just divine healing. This is something we will not experience until the Millennium, but he says he has it now.

Copeland says “I've had people die on me standing there saying bless God you ain't gonna die. And they did anyway and I'm glad I stood, and I'm glad I stood, and I'm glad I stood. I ain't never stood for anything in my own life that didn't come to pass. I can only use my faith just so far with you.”

Copeland is saying that his faith works efficiently and successfully for himself but for others it is not optimum strength. Yet it is not his fault. He teaches faith never fails, especially for himself. So where is God in this. Its all dependent on him. His faith, his power, his will. But it can fail for you.

But he will also say, “The very faith that God used when He created, and what we read there in the first 2 chapters of Genesis, is the faith that’s burning in your spirit. But now if you’ve made Jesus the Lord of your life, it’s the same faith. Well, He created all those planets, how come you can’t create something? You don’t know as much about it as He does. He has a greater working knowledge of that faith than you do. But we’re learning. Our time is coming. And in some ways its already here” (Aug. 18,1999 John Hagee's Church, on LeSea Broadcasting).

Like Copeland many have died trying to activate spiritual laws and principles. Numerous people who have been influenced by this teaching have said that they stood on the word for people dying, and this person is not going to die and they died. And their faith becomes crushed because they thought they heard God say they would live. How? By someone else usually telling them by his stripes we are healed. They may not directly tell the people to get rid of their insulin or other medicines but they encourage this by stating emphatically that it is a promise of God to heal all by faith.

Kenneth Copeland, in a taped message entitled “Why all are not healed” (# 01-4001), states, “Several people that I know had criticized and called that Faith bunch out of Tulsa a cult. And some of 'em are dead right today in an early grave because of it, and there's more than one of them got cancer.”

Prophetess and promoter of the gold dust Ruth Ward Heflin died from cancer. (Article: The Life and Times of Golden Girl and Globetrotter Ruth Ward Heflin, by G. Richard Fisher, Personal Freedom Outreach)

While these faith healers claim to heal all kinds of diseases, their cancer is still in the body of Christ and growing both spiritually and physically. What is interesting is that the people who are called Word of Faith teachers do not seem to have any of a lesser ratio of cancer and sickness than others. These ministers know one another, they teach the same doctrine, and share the same stories. . .and sickness is common among them and their families. It is unusual for a specific group that teaches the same doctrine of healing to have a higher percentage of their families to be struck with cancer. Is God telling them something? Are they or their followers taking notice? No, that would be a negative confession...

Furthermore, almost all the faith teachers wear glasses, It's right there on their face as they tell you that you can be healed and call out all the diseases people are being healed of. God made it so you can’t miss their contradiction, but many do. Why? Because they do not know how to listen with discernment, they believe almost every word these men say verbatim. How sad.

On January 6, 1999 Diane Sawyer, and Sam Donaldson of 20/20 did a report on the Followers of Christ, where over a thousand people attend a small church outside Portland, Oregon. An alarming number of children in the Followers have died while their parents prayed instead of getting a doctor. 78 children are buried since 1955 in the Followers of Christ cemetery just outside Oregon City. Doctors said at least 21 probably would have lived with medical intervention, often by using simple antibiotics.

An article in the Journal of Pediatrics examined the deaths of 172 children from families who relied upon faith healing from 1975 to 1995. They concluded that four out of five ill children who died under the care of faith healers would most likely have survived, if they had received medical care. Eighty-one percent of the deaths were caused by conditions that had a medical survival rate of 90%.

Many die from the promotion of health by faith. Charles Meade, is the founder of an End Time's cult located in Florida. They have had Over 19 children die due to his faith stance and his revulsion medicine.

One of the more famous cases is Dr. Hobart Freeman, who was the founder and pastor of the Glory Barn. He blamed his own son-in-law for a lack of faith in the death of his own grandchild. The fact was a routine operation could have saved his life. He had detested medical doctors and persuaded his members to avoid the doctors as well. His faith stance touched 97 people directly, they died! And Eventually Hobart himself died in 1984. Despite all the documentation of deaths instead of healings, his ministry continues in the congregations he established. People ignore the facts and follow the person.

In 1998, Dr. Seth Asser, a critical-care pediatrician at Methodist Children's Hospital in San Antonio did a paper in the professional Journal Pediatrics. Asser examined the deaths of 172 children from families who relied on faith healing. Families from Christian Scientist, Faith Tabernacle, Faith Assembly and several other assorted religious. He concluded 4 out of 5 ill children who died under the care of faith healers would have most likely survived if they had received medical attention. 81% of the deaths were caused by conditions that had a 90% chance of survival rate if they would have seen there physician. Most could have been cured from routine medical care.

The Christian Science Church which has been practicing faith healing, has a national membership of 170,000. They had 28 child deaths between 1975 and 1995, according to one (Asser's) study. So When we say Christian Science is a cult, and way less people die percentage wise than the faith Churches, what do we say to our people? There are no real statistics on how many have become sick or died from the word faith teaching of Isa.53 by his stripes we are healed. But we can estimate it certainly is more than Christian Science, and it may be closer to the J.W's and their anti-blood policy.

The charismatic author Jamie Buckingham wrote “I'm healed” In charisma Magazine and a several months later died of cancer. Jamie was under a medical doctors care. “One day my wife ... suddenly spoke aloud [and] said, 'Your healing was purchased at the cross.' ... Here is what I discovered. You have what you speak. If you want to change something, you must believe it enough to speak it. ... If you say you're sick, you'll be (and remain) sick. It was not mine. It was the devil's. I didn't have cancer. I had Jesus. The cancer was trying to have me, but the Word of God said I was healed through what Jesus did on Calvary. ... It was a Friday afternoon. The tape was an Oral Roberts' sermon ... I came up off the sofa, shouting, 'I'm healed!' My wife leaped out of her chair and shouted, 'Hallelujah!' For the next 30 minutes all we did was walk around the house shouting thanks to God and proclaiming my healing” “The cancer was trying to have me, but the word of God said I was healed through what Jesus did at Calvary.” (Jamie Buckingham, “My Summer of Miracles,” Charisma, April 1991). Ten months after the publication of his article claiming he was healed he died of cancer ( Feb.17, 1992)

Buckingham had made other statements to the fact, “I also believe God has promised me that I can live to be at least 100 years old ”(Charisma April 1990). His wife had a prophecy “You will not die but live and proclaim what the Lord has done.”

Everyone believed this, his wife , Oral Roberts, his congregation-but they were all wrong. This is not an uncommon practice of people believing they have heard from God and died. Instead of preparing to meet their make they presume that they will have many more years on earth.

One of the more recent sad stories was John Osteen who was a pastor in Houston of a mega-church, who had kidney dialysis in late 1998. He also had a heart catheterization in August that determined all was well with his heart at that time. Later on doctors performed surgery to put in a pacemaker for his heart.

Pastor Osteen knew “he was in need of a miracle.” He claimed God had given him Psalm 27:14. Requests went out to his friends to wait on the Lord with him, and agree with him for a creative miracle for his kidneys and his heart.

They agreed with the Psalmist in Psalm 41of the Lords deliverance and protection to keep him alive. He will transform his illness. He will raise him up! The “Lord” gave him a vision that he would be preaching into his 90's.

Osteen “confessed,” his healing and 20,000 members in his church stood in “agreement” with him for his recovery. They believed he would have his miracle just like his wife Dodie received her miracle (Dodie his wife got liver cancer and was treated through medical attention). But unfortunately did not happen for John. Here is a man who lived the faith message and when it came down to it, it failed. As it has for so many others. This does not mean it fails 100%, because God is the one who heals and he will have mercy on whom he wills.

If someone says they are having heart trouble and they deny this symptom claiming their healing by faith they could die. A perfect example of this is when Oral Roberts was on Paul Crouch on “Praise the Lord” show on TBN (October 6, 1992). I watched as Crouch was asked to lay hands on Oral Roberts to minister to his chest pains, Roberts exclaimed, “I feel the healing power of Jesus!” and said it felt like an “electric current go through him.” Paul you are anointed. Oral Roberts was pronounced healed on TBN. But was he really? It was reported less than four hours later, while visiting a home in Newport Beach, Roberts felt more pains and was hospitalized at Hoag Presbyterian Memorial Hospital (also in Newport Beach), shortly after midnight. Subsequent articles report that Roberts's heart attack was “near fatal.” (“Evangelist Has Tests,” The Orange County [CA] Register [Dec.16 1992], A-7) the healing evangelist now has a pacemaker (“Roberts Out of Hospital,” The Orange County [CA] Register (2l December 1992), A-30). Of course this is ignored by the crowds that follow his healing doctrine. One can only wonder why?

Frederick K. Price, Word of Faith pastor of a mega-church in Los Angeles teaches that no one should die before 70. He became famous for saying why would God want to live in a sick body.” If you keep talking death, that is what you are going to have. “If you keep talking sickness and disease, that is what you are going to have, because you are going to create the reality of them with your own mouth. That is a divine law.” (Fred Price, Realm, 29).

“ ... how can you glorify God in your body, when it doesn't function right? How can you glorify God? How can He get glory when your body doesn't even work? ... What makes you think the Holy Ghost wants to live inside a body where He can't see out through the windows and He can't hear with the ears? What makes you think the Holy Spirit wants to live inside of a physical body where the limbs and the organs and the cells do not function right? ... And what makes you think He wants to live in a temple where He can't see out of the eyes, and He can't walk with the feet, and He can't move with the hand? ... The only eyes that he has that are in the earth realm are the eyes that are in the body. If He can't see out of them then God's gonna be limited he's not going to be helped...” applause (Frederick K.C. Price, “Is God Glorified Through Sickness?” (Los Angeles: Crenshaw Christian Center, n.d.), audiotape #FP605).

Price also discourages the use of medication, saying, “When you have developed your faith to such an extent that you can stand on the promises of God, then you won't need medicine” (Faith, foolishness or presumption, p.88, 1979, Harrison House). Price states, “We don't allow sickness in our home (Is Healing for All? p.20, Harrison House, 1976)

Really Fred? Yes you do. His own wife, Betty got cancer. How did it come into their house? In October 1990 Price openly said she had developed cancer-an “inoperable malignant tumor in her pelvic area.” (Betty Price praise report, Ever Increasing Faith Messenger). She was medically treated by chemo-therapy and God had mercy on her and she was healed. Thank God for his mercy and not mans word. What does this mean after hearing Prices own statements of how legalistic he is, “We don't allow sickness in our home.” According to her husbands teaching the Holy Spirit leave his wife because she had a sick body. His faith was not enough, Fred’s own wife needed a doctor just like anyone else would. Price now claims she is free of cancer, medication, and pain (but only “95 percent free of a limp” (CRI telephone interview with Crenshaw Christian center staff member July 31 1992) also Betty Price health update...then... and... now from Betty Price. Ever Increasing Faith Messenger 13, 4 (fall, 1992):5 (cited in Christianity in Crises).

It is not by the amount of our faith that has God heal us. God can heal even if there is little faith represented. God is not bound to heal by our declaration of faith; healing rests in His sovereign will and timing. We need to understand that all miraculous healing is an act of God's grace, otherwise we are in control not him. Unless one understands the sovereignty of God and his control they will never have the peace God wants to give them through any trial of sickness.

Charles Capps, Word of Faith teacher, mimics Copeland as he teaches power of our words to create reality saying “You can have what you say! “ “ I don’t deny the existence of disease. I deny the right of that disease to exist in this body, because I’m the Body of Christ” (The Tongue p. 43.) “This is not theory, It is fact. It is spiritual law. It works every time it is applied correctly.” His wife got cancer and was medically treated. So where's the power that is claimed for his own personal miracle.

Ruth Carter Stapleton, ( Faith Healing sister of former US President Jimmie Carter) believed in faith healing and refused medical treatment for cancer. She died in 1983 of the disease.

Ruth Heflin who was 60 years died of cancer Sept.15, 2000. Yet she firmly believed “I suddenly knew how easy it is to raise the dead and to heal all manner of sickness and disease.. how easy it is to see blind eyes open and deaf ears unstopped” (Harvest Glory her 1999 autobiography).

R.W. Schambach, is one of the favorite Faith Healer's on LeSea and TBN. He has said “You don’t have any problems, all you need is faith in God.” and on TBN recently he stated “God will heal you”. But its reported that he got a quadruple heart bypass from doctor (not doctor Jesus). What do those who hold to the faith teaching say about their own leaders doing this? It is for the most part ignored.

What about their healing, their confession is not their possession. It's not working for them either. I know some may mean well and naively teach this but it more harmful to believe in fantasy than to face the reality of truth and have time to do something about it.

Why did none of the people who are deathly sick call for Oral Roberts or go to a Benny Hinn crusade? Why didn't they send for a prayer cloth from Parsley or get a trinket from Marilyn Hickey. If what they teach is true none of them should be sick for long, they should all have supernatural healing.

Why not? Maybe they know something that you don't? They do not trust their own welfare into their hands of faith. There are many Word Faith teachers that are getting medical attention. Instead of being healed by faith, they go to medical doctors to get their bodies repaired like anyone else. None of these folks got a “miracle” or received “divine healing” directly from the hand of God or themselves. They did what every person with common sense would do, they got medical help.

John Wimber who made famous the Signs and Wonders Movement, believed in “Power Healing,” was dying from cancer. He was medically treated even though he believed God could heal. No “power” healing was presented, it was chemo-therapy. He eventually died of something unrelated to his sickness
Chris Wimber of Vineyard Music died on Feb 6, 1998 of melanoma cancer. Although they had members who supposedly “healed” people of cancer and other sicknesses, even Aids - there was no “healing” for Chris.

Concerning the deaths of people Morris Cerullo has pronounced healed. Among these so-called `miracles' was a four year old child falsely pronounced Healed by Cerullo in a London arena before an audience of thousands. The child died shortly afterward. Natiela Barnes age 4 died as a result of Morris Cerrulo pronouncing her healed (Charismania-when Fundamentalism goes wrong, Rowland Howard, London 1997 41-43).

Dr. Peter May, a respected evangelical physician and member of the Christian Medical Fellowship and Church of England General Synod, asked for a list of six of Cerullo's best medically documented miracles. When these were eventually forthcoming not one proved to have been a genuine cure. The tragedy of these kinds of deaths is that they were covered by the media, undermining Christian witness to the general public.”

Audrey Reynolds went to Cerullo's Mission London in 1992, certain she had been healed of ankle injury. She felt well and therefore stopped taking all medication including her anti-epilepsy drugs. Six days later she had a fit and drowned in her bath. The Southwark Coroner, Sir Montague Levine, concluded: “It is a tragedy that she went to this meeting and thought she had been cured of everything. Sadly it led to her death.”

Real faith in truth does not kill, so what is going on? People are dying from these men's teachings and proclamations of people being healed.

The public notices when someone claims to be healed. Before we publicly claim this, we need to make sure, lest we have them mock the church because of a false testimony. The truth matters people, and nothing can hurt the truth more than outlandish unproven assertions of supernatural power that does not take place. Why should we believe tremendous miracles take place just because a Televangelist says so?

Now you won't have to go to faith healer but visit a healing center. Benny Hinn Promises to build a World Healing Center where there will be Healing Stream and healing fountains, healing gardens, with healing statues of biblical healing saints from the Old Testament. Hinn promises to build chapels for everyone of those greats of the past where you can visit Kathryn Kuhlmann, Amiee Simple McPhearson, Oral Roberts and Dr. Sumerall.

What many do not know is that Hinn’s idol Kathryn Kuhlman, died of heart failure in 1976. It was found out that she had lived with heart disease for nearly twenty years.

Its not my point to impugn Kuhlman, but there a many testimonies that are against the healings, as there are for them. The point is that these people who claim to heal are sick, sometimes very ill themselves.

Kurt Koch was a renowned evangelical researcher. In one portion of his book Occult ABC he describes his research into Kathryn Kuhlman's healing ministry. He carefully followed up on a list of 28 cases of alleged healings in the Minneapolis, Minnesota, area. These cases were submitted to him by the Kuhlman's organization as the best examples of healings which had occurred under her ministrations. He summarizes his findings as: “Ten had not been healed, seven had experienced an improvement in their condition, eleven had diseases in which the mind can play an important part. In the whole of this extensive report, there is not one clear case of healing from an organic disease” (Kurt Koch, Occult ABC, 1981).

Kathryn Kuhlman had brought one of her healing services to St. Louis. A fleet of chartered buses brought people to the meeting from a near 200-mile radius of the city. One driver from the bus noted: “'She doesn’t always succeed,’ said a driver from Chester. ‘My bus was pretty quiet on the way home last year [after her service]. But for some of those people a little inspiration does wonders, if only for a little while. I had a guy last year who was dying of cancer. He got up on the stage and said he was healed. He died a week later.'“ (St. Louis Post Dispatch, 5/4/75, “Praying, Hoping, Waiting...” pg. G11).

Did anyone die after Jesus pronounced them healed? Of course not. Do you ever see anyone leave the stage at the Healing Crusades not being healed. Is everyone getting healed? Because that is the impression they give. If miracles actually convinced people, Jesus' own family would have been convinced, but they were not.

Dr. Nolan did work on 82 cases of Kathryn Kuhlman's healings using names that she herself supplied. His conclusion at the end of the entire investigation was that not one of the so called healings was legitimate not a one! This does not impugn God, but those representing him. For God is able to heal today as he always was able. I believe God heals and that we should pursue healing from him, but not only him. Doctors are a God sent profession. What do you think the Jews did in the OT before Jesus came? They went to doctors. After Jesus left do you think they looked for only healers when they were sick?

Hinn states the TV will be conduit for this power as “People around the world who will lose loved ones, will say to undertakers, ahh, not yet. I want to take my dead loved one and place him in front of that TV set for 24 hours… Placing them before a television set, waiting for God’s power to come through and touch them. (TBN 10/19/99)

Recently Sheryl Pruit Salem's daughter tragically died and it was distressing to see her break down and then say God is sovereign. The very opposite of what they (word/faith) actually believe, as they do not pray thy will be done. Hinn said he is going to have the Salem's on the program that had a tragic loss of their 6 year old child. Yet right after he stated this he said “No matter what you need our God wants to heal you and bless your life” (Dec.28, '99). Why did they not seek Hinn out to heal their child if this is true? Why does none of the sick healers go to Hinn for their healing if he holds healing services more than all of them? Do they not have enough faith?

There seems to be as much room for faith healing malpractice as there is malpractice in the medical industry. What becomes most disturbing is when people get computerized letters from certain TV faith healing ministers saying that the Lord has led them to pray for a certain one to be healed. They received a word of knowledge for you or your loved one. The problem is they receive this letter after that person has already died. So who is telling them this? Why are they not resurrected? (That's another article- on all the hyped resurrection stories occurring).

Before you finish reading this article I want to say that I do believe in healing and miracles. So I'm not anti-supernatural, what I oppose is the false stories and unbiblical methods that give rise to them. I'm believing for a miracle for those in the Word/ Faith movement. Many who are involved in this movement need a miracle to get out.

Almost the majority of the known healers went for some kind of treatment from medical professionals. This was in spite of all their claims of miracles and the practice of their “positive confession” faith.

Even Joyce Meyers did, and she was honest to admit that she had breast cancer and was medically treated. One of the few honest admission’s.

There are many documented cases where people who were dying prayed to God of their own religion (and imagination) and were healed. There are numerous documented cases where people who were sick and dying had made no claim to faith, used prayer, or even believed in God, had a miraculous cure. How are these explained? You could be sure if a faith-healer was nearby they would find a way to attribute it to their ministry.

Now we have a first with Rev. Skankster's Online Healing Ministry. (http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/7383/heal.html) link no longer works

You no longer have to go to a crusade” That's right, now YOU can be healed ONLINE, in the comfort of your own home! Whether you're young or old, black or white, rich or poor...God's healing power is available to you at the touch of a button. Please, come and join us. Witness the miracles of Jesus Christ!

He claims on his site, No Affliction is out of reach of healing! Any affliction will be completely healed. (When enough funds are received he will expand his services to include online EXORCISMS) Now, even the most unyielding demons can be cast out from the comfort of your favorite chair.... All this is GUARANTEED! All this for the incredibly low, low price of $49.95. Which he claims is “ a small price to pay for your own personal miracle!”

This is a VERY special service available only at this address on the Internet!

His Directions are: 1. Place your left hand on the screen. 2.Now without removing your left hand from the screen, click the “HEAL NOW!” button with your mouse. 3.Sit back and experience the warmth and peacefulness that accompanies God's healing powers as your ailment is divinely removed. 4.This is the most important step! After you have received your healing you must say, “Thank you, Lord Jesus, for the annointing!” Be sure to stress annointing or else it will not work.”

Yes say the magic words to be deceived. Well the healing Rev. Shankster is certainly a prankster. The sad part is that many will naïvely go to him, desperate for a healing.

What if I told your loved one that God guarantees YOU TO BE HEALED when they were dying. Would you want to see them take a chance on this? What if it didn't work, would you be angry? What does it take to mobilize you? Do we care for the people who are being deceived by these false promises? The faith of some men become a license to kill.

So why do people die from THIS faith? Because the faith they are exercising is not the faith of the Bible. God does not promise that EVERYONE will be healed if they have faith. So it is not based on truth. So why do some get healed and others not? Because God is gracious and merciful, and it is there time. For whatever reason, only God knows. He has the power to heal at any time, but he has chosen not to all the time. He also has the power to destroy all wickedness, but he has chosen not to. Yet this too is a promise in the Scripture. We know one day he will. So it becomes a matter of timing, not just a matter of faith. It is the same for healing. As Christians we believe in the power of God! Do we actually believe that God can raise the dead? Certainly! The real question is “When?” The Scriptures are clear in Romans 8:23, We are “waiting for ... the redemption of our bodies.” The Resurrection is connected to the 2nd coming of Christ as stated in 1 Corinthians 15. If he resurrects some individuals today, Praise the Lord. If he does not, we still have hope in his promise.

A story everyone should read - http://geocities.com/robbi01/

This article will continually be updated as long as these people continue to teach this falsehood and die from disease and sickness they claim to be healed of.